Sunday Advent begins and we will celebrate Holy Communion together. I was inspired by these words:
“When we celebrate God’s grace to us here, we are learning how to celebrate His goodness in every aspect of our lives, and that includes our orientation to festivals like Christmas. In The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, Father Christmas appears in the book to give gifts and to destroy winter. He distributes his gifts and moves on. We should learn to be much more like him. And who comes next, and what does she say? Correct, the White Witch comes next, and she says, “What is the meaning of all this gluttony, this waste, this self-indulgence?” In the White Witch’s words we hear all the echoes of the pious fussers.

But what do we learn in this meal, set before us? We learn of God’s extravagance. We learn of His prodigality. We learn of His overflow. We learn that He doesn’t know how to stay with respectable limits. Do you call saving us staying within respectable limits? Not a bit of it.”

-Doug Wilson

Tagged with:
 

Sunday we will share in Holy Communion, with God and with each other.  We want you to partake together with discernment, understanding, faith and joy.  Toward that end, here is an excerpt from a Mike Horton article:
There are essentially 4 views of what happens in Holy Communion. First, there is the Roman Catholic view, which is familiar to many. The official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church is that the bread and wine are actually changed into the body and blood of Christ. This is called “transubstantiation,” from two words meaning, “to change substance.” The bread still looks like bread and the wine still has all of the appearances of wine, but appearances are deceiving. Furthermore, the Lord’s Supper, according to the Roman Catholic Church, is the repetition of Christ’s atoning sacrifice and every time one participates in this sacrament, they believe that Christ is being sacrificed again on the altar for their sins.

(Views 2,3, and 4) At the time of the Reformation, however, Protestants differed in their understanding of what actually was received–and how–in Holy Communion. First, the Anabaptists (View #2) interpreted this meal as merely a memorial or symbolic remembering of Christ’s death. The purpose was to arouse a sense of gratitude and duty in the light of the suffering Jesus endured for us. The Lutherans (View #3) argued that this denied Christ’s express statement, “This is my body,” and made this sacrament into the work of man, because the activity was human–my remembering, rather than divine–God forgiving. Lutherans believe, therefore, that Christ is physically present at the altar in this sacrament, but deny the Roman Catholic doctrine of a change in substance from bread and wine into body and blood. They also, of course, deny the notion of a resacrifice of Christ. The Reformed (View #4 and that of Christ Community), after Calvin, were influenced by the Eastern Orthodox interpretation, arguing, along with Lutherans and Roman Catholics, that Christ is truly communicated through this sacrament, against the Anabaptist view of Communion as a mere memorial. But they believed that the mode or means of receiving Christ was by the Holy Spirit uniting believers to Christ in heaven through the elements of bread and wine.

The apostle Paul says, in fact, that Holy Communion is an actual participation in the body and blood of Christ: “Is not the cup of thanksgiving…a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread the we break a participation in the body of Christ?” “Therefore,” says Paul, “whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the memory of the body and blood of the Lord.” Is that it? No, Paul says that he “will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.”

But the purpose of this Holy Supper is not to hold out judgment, but rather to hold out God’s forgiveness and pardon. Through it, we receive the benefits of Christ’s death and present intercession; in fact, through it, we receive nothing less than Christ himself.

the article is HERE

Tagged with:
 

You will be helped in your preparation for this meal of grace by this Scotty Smith 2 minute teaching on Communion. HERE

 

 

Tagged with:
 

Literally, it is a false statement – in John 6 literal eating is not the way of true belief. On the other hand, the discourse functions to show that eating is a metaphor for believing and in this sense the metaphor is perhaps better inverted: in John 6 believing is eating.

In chapter 6:53ff., the evangelist is not emphasising the importance of the eucharist but pointing to an abiding belief in the ‘flesh and bloodness’ of the incarnation, which is the true end of all eucharistic rites and Christian discipleship.This means that if John 6 is not about the eucharist, the eucharist is undoubtedly about John 6.

–David Gibson, in a helpful journal article

Tagged with:
 

Sunday @ 8:30 & 11:15, during our worship service we will celebrate the Eucharist. For your thoughts and preparation: “Someone has said that the four most disputed words in the history of the church are “This is my body.” Without entering the lists on all that might be said about this clause, surely we can agree that one of its functions, as it is repeated in the ritual that Christ Jesus himself prescribed, is commemorative: “Do this in remembrance of me” (22:19). It is shocking that this should be necessary, in exactly the same way that it is shocking that a commemorative rite like the Passover should have been necessary. But history shows how quickly the people of God drift toward peripheral matters, and end up ignoring or denying the center. By a simple rite, Jesus wants his followers to come back to his death, his shed blood, his broken body, again and again and again.

It is also an anticipatory rite. It looks forward to the consummated kingdom, when the Passover and the Lord’ s Supper alike find their fulfillment (22:16, 18). We eat and drink as he prescribes “until he comes” (1 Cor. 11:26), when commemoration and proclamation will be swallowed up by the bliss of his presence.”

–Don Carson

Tagged with: